The Case for One to One Technology
Just a few short years ago, it was considered a luxury for a
school to have enough technology devices to be able to assign one to each
student for use in the classroom and often at home. This model is commonly
referred to as a one to one technology program. With each passing year, the
cost of moving a school to a one to one model has come down considerably. According
to CNBC, today
nearly half of all classroom devices sold are a Google Chromebook. Chromebooks make up 4.4 million of the 8.9 million
devices sold to schools and school districts K-12. To put it in perspective,
this means that on average, 30,000 new Chromebooks are activated in schools
each school day.
This news comes as no surprise because today’s Chromebooks can be
purchased for under $200 and are some of the most robust, durable devices on
the market with excellent battery and shelf lives. This purchase price comes at
a considerable savings for school districts that would otherwise rely on
printed textbooks for its primary student resources. Even after purchasing
online resources for the devices, the four-year cost to a school for the
student to have a technology device such as a Chromebook is less than half of
what the school would typically spend to provide the student with printed
textbooks.
Just a few years ago when costs were still fairly high, many in
the education world questioned whether or not one to one programs were worth
the investment. Some argued that having the technology was not raising test
scores. Some argued that classroom instruction remained unchanged. People
feared that simply providing students with a device would not be enough if the
devices weren’t going to be used to their fullest potential. How could a school
make sure these technology devices didn’t just become fancy word processing
machines or web browsers? It would take a commitment from school leaders to set
the direction and the expectations for how technology would be used in
classrooms moving forward.
Late last year, Edutopia blogger and Massachusetts school tech
director Andrew
Marcinek identified five
steps for implementing a successful one to one environment.
·
Define the goals of the program
·
Define the role of the device in the classroom
·
Model how to harness the device’s power
·
Put it away when appropriate
·
Teach, model, and support information literacy
To
promote the model, Marcinek states, “A 1:1 environment should not be
intimidating. It should be our ally in the daily task to provide our students
with the best access to information and promote learning. There is no denying
the rapid pace of our world and its ever-changing economy. It is our
responsibility as educators - at every level - to prepare our students for this
environment. The environment will not adapt to them, they must adapt to the
demand of the market. A 1:1 environment is simply a start.”
Last month in the
newsletter The Conversation, educational
researchers Binbin Zheng and Mark Warschauer made the case for why
schools should provide one laptop per child. Their recommendations come after
a decade of study with schools and school districts with one to one programs.
They found that in the schools they studied, “students' test scores in science,
writing, math and English language arts improved significantly.” Furthermore, “students
with laptops wrote more frequently across a wider variety of genres. They also
received more feedback on their writing. In addition, we found they edited and
revised their papers more often, drew on a wider range of resources to write,
and published or shared their work with others more often.” Also, “students
with access to laptops worked more autonomously and gained experience in
project-based learning. This allowed them to synthesize and critically apply
knowledge.”
My New Hampshire
school will be adopting a one to one program for the first time this fall. We
are looking forward to the opportunity to use the model to positively impact student
learning and achievement in our school.
This article was written originally for MultiBriefs Education.
Comments
Post a Comment