The Relationship Between Student Behavior and Engagement
A recent Mind/Shift article by Katrina Schwartz
highlighted the efforts by San Francisco middle school principal Michael Essien
to get classroom behavior under control in his school. Essien described his
problem in this way: “Students weren't
learning because students were having challenges in the classroom with their
own academic abilities and or behaviors. Teachers who were trying to teach were
having a difficult time getting into lessons because they were dealing with
behaviors. It was challenging to hold collaborative conversations among the
teachers because all teachers could deal with in any setting was the
overwhelming behavior.” Essien found one solution by helping his teachers
develop more engaging, project-based, hands-on learning activities. “I saw that
kids who are in public school, if they were exposed to certain pedagogy and had
certain content, that they can learn regardless of situation,” Essien said.
“Kids had a great time,
especially since in the project-based learning they had to produce something in
the end.” His efforts started a cultural change that created student-centered
learning environments which dramatically raised student engagement and lower
behavior issues.
Essien’s story touched me
personally as I too shared his frustrations. Over the last ten years as a
school administrator, I have seen a dramatic decline in classroom disruptions
and general student misbehavior that I believe is correlated to increased
student engagement in school. To understand how far my school has come, it is
helpful to know where it started. Consider this scenario. Just ten years ago
this was the typical sequence of events when a student become disruptive in the
classroom at my New Hampshire high
school:
Teacher: “Robert, please pick your
head up off of the desk and join the rest of the class on the writing
assignment we are all working on.” Robert doesn’t move his head, and a few
other students look on, waiting to see what the teacher will do next. With a
slightly elevated voice, the teacher says, “Robert, I asked you to pick your
head up. You aren’t going to learn anything if you won’t participate in the
class.” Slowly, and somewhat reluctantly, Robert picks his head up just enough
to squint at the teacher, making eye contact. He mutters, “Yeah, I didn’t get
much sleep last night. I’ll do that assignment later. Thanks.” He then puts his
head back on the desk.
A few students sitting closest to
Robert begin to chuckle and anxiously look at the teacher to see what he is
going to do next. The teacher, in a much more authoritative tone, walks right
up to Robert and bends down to talk directly to him while he sat with his head
down on the desk. “Robert, I am not going to ask you again. You have two
choices right now. You can either do this assignment or you can go see Mr.
Stack in the office.” Robert picks his head up, smiles at the teacher, and
stands up to make a quick exit from the classroom. Three minutes later, he is
waiting for me in my office. Clearly, Robert has made his choice.
In my early days as an
administrator, I had many conversations each day like the one I was about to
have with Robert in an effort to understand why he would choose to come to my
office instead of staying in class. For me, the discussion was a losing battle because
I already knew why he left. He was completely and utterly disengaged from what
was happening in class. No matter how hard I tried to motivate him to think
differently about his choice, he wasn’t convinced that he should have stayed in
class. Worst still, at the time we had a strict agreement with our teachers
that if a student was sent from class, they could not be returned before the
end of the period. As more and more students began to stack up in the office
area as the period wore on, I and my fellow administrators would often move
them to the in-school suspension room where they would remain, often with their
friends, until the bell would ring to start the next period. This vicious cycle
continued, day after day. As one might expect, the more students missed class,
the more disengaged they became, and the more they wanted to miss class.
Like Essien, my staff
quickly discovered that the more we engaged in student-centered, project-based,
and hands-on activities in the classroom, the most students would be engaged
and less likely to act out. Additionally, we discovered that adding choice and
voice options for students continued to reverse the trend of student
disengagement. We also made the same realization that Essien made three time
zones to our west. In general, we stopped offering students the choice to stay
in class or leave. We found other ways to support them when they were
disengaged.
Essien realized that
instead of asking teachers to send disruptive students out to receive supports,
he brought the supports to the student in the classroom. He called these
supports “push ins,” and they were adults who didn’t have teaching roles such
as social workers, deans, and academic advisers. “Students ended up learning
that, when a teacher calls for a push-in that they were never getting out of
class, that somebody was coming,” Essien said. Behavior began to change
dramatically, and a new cycle was formed where students stayed in class and
found ways to re engage in their learning. The model shows promise and may
serve as inspiration for other school leaders looking to change the culture at
their school.
Comments
Post a Comment