How to Fire Kids Up to be Excited for Their Core Subjects
I spent years as a high
school math teacher unsuccessfully trying to find an answer to this question:
Why didn’t my students have as much passion and enthusiasm for math as they did
for their extra curricular activities, and what could I do as a teacher to
change that? The closest I had ever come to reaching an answer actually came
two years after I left the classroom to become a school administrator. That
year (over a decade ago), my school tried an experiment. We paired a math
teacher with a woodshop teacher to offer a class entitled “Geometry in the
Woodshop.” The class was offered as an interdisciplinary project-based
experience where students would work through a series of woodshop projects that
would apply various geometry topics. The two-credit class was co-taught by both
teachers each day. As a whole, the experiment was a success as kids generally
found success and increased their engagement and excitement for math. Of
course, it helped that we started with a group of students who already liked
working in the woodshop. Unfortunately, the experiment was not picked up for a
second year because we just didn’t have enough students elect to enroll. With
such a small school population to start with, the woodshop was too niche of a
topic to pair geometry with. Now if we could have paired math with something
like band, or sports, we may have been on to something greater.
This recent Mind/Shift article attempts to shed light on an answer
to this question by suggesting that to engage students and teachers, educators
need to treat subjects like extracurriculars. The article goes on to state, “
The challenge for teachers who want to tap into extracurricular engagement is
to ensure students are learning the required curriculum while also making room
for differentiation.” There are different ways to accomplish this. One way is
to incorporate the ideals of project-based learning. The article gives the
example of the Clark Montessori
School in Cincinnati where time at the end of every
marking period is earmarked for project-based electives of the students'
choosing. “In courses like “Rockets and Roller Coasters” students design their
own scale models of both, and visit military bases to see rockets in action and
amusement parks for roller coasters.”
Another strategy is to
allow students to move through learning at their own pace. The Mind/Shift article
referenced Lodestar
Academy Charter School in Oakland, the day is organized
into two parts: A part that allows students time for expeditionary and
project-based learning, and a part dedicated to time in literacy and math labs
where students learn these at their own pace. The article noted, “But by
letting students work at their own pace, they see huge gains in student
achievement for all.”
In both of these
examples, student motivation and engagement was promoted through choice and
voice, and deep, authentic learning. Educators opted for depth of learning over
the “coverage” of material.
How can classroom
teachers make the switch to deeper learning? One way to start is to visit this website where educators can
browse resources for teaching and learning for deeper learning. Topics covered
include project-based learning, work-based learning, blended learning, inquiry-based
learning, connected learning, personalized learning, performance assessments,
portfolio assessments, and project-based learning assessments.
It is natural for us as
educators to walk to tread lightly with this topic for fear that a lack of
coverage of material will lead to gaps in learning. I challenge this
misconception by asking you how you learn best. I’ll bet it isn’t always when
someone explains every detail of a topic to you while you sit and listen. You
need time to dive deep into topics - to explore the parts that are unfamiliar
to you, to test out theories, and to make your own connections to prior
knowledge and extend your thinking in new ways. This only happens when you
engage in deeper learning. I ask, why would we want any different for our
students?
Comments
Post a Comment